Because I have the attention span of a gnat…HB F4F-3 wildcat 1/48.

Scale Model Addict - Model Tips, Guides, Tools & Tech, Tutorials, and Community

Help Support Scale Model Addict:

Ron2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2025
Messages
1,959
City & State/Province
Mesa AZ
Nice quick kit. Nice detail and you could add to this and make it very detailed. I was in the mood for a ww2 plane like the wildcat so I started this yesterday. Applied primer and base coats, doing my aluminum base coat in cockpit and will cover with interior green/black and then pick and sand spots to the aluminum base.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7862.jpeg
    IMG_7862.jpeg
    2.6 MB
  • IMG_7863.jpeg
    IMG_7863.jpeg
    2.2 MB
  • IMG_7864.jpeg
    IMG_7864.jpeg
    2.1 MB
  • IMG_7865.jpeg
    IMG_7865.jpeg
    1.3 MB
  • IMG_7866.jpeg
    IMG_7866.jpeg
    2.2 MB
  • IMG_7868.jpeg
    IMG_7868.jpeg
    2.1 MB
  • IMG_7867.jpeg
    IMG_7867.jpeg
    1.9 MB
A bit more. Tried dry brushing gauges, unstuck at dry brushing, got frustrated and then noticed they don't really stick out very much. Cant find any spare decals that will work and "a man on a fast horse isn't going to notice" so im about ready to button this up.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7871.jpeg
    IMG_7871.jpeg
    1.3 MB
  • IMG_7872.jpeg
    IMG_7872.jpeg
    1.3 MB
  • IMG_7873.jpeg
    IMG_7873.jpeg
    1.9 MB
A bit more. Tried dry brushing gauges, unstuck at dry brushing, got frustrated and then noticed they don't really stick out very much. Cant find any spare decals that will work and "a man on a fast horse isn't going to notice" so im about ready to button this up.
Added a seat belt. For some reason this fuselage reminds me of a cartoon fat lady in heels.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7878.jpeg
    IMG_7878.jpeg
    1.2 MB
  • IMG_7877.jpeg
    IMG_7877.jpeg
    2 MB
Looks better with wings! Pretty nice detail. One odd thing is the guns. One sticks out about 3/16- 4mm haha, the other is out just a little nub, quick glance and it looks like it's missing. I've got a 1/32 trumpeter version of the wildcat in my stash hmmm…
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.8 MB
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    909.3 KB
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.4 MB
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I think so, but I'm not knowledgeable about about F4Fs to say for sure. But if you think this looks odd, try a P-47 :)

View attachment 188908
That doesn't look odd to me. The difference between the xtended barrels seems out of scale to me. It's more of an asthetic thing because the second barrel disappears.
 
I think so, but I'm not knowledgeable about about F4Fs to say for sure. But if you think this looks odd, try a P-47 :)

View attachment 188908
Great photo, and so many questions...
Clearly the wings were designed to handle the weight of all that ammo, but still, how much did it add to the plane's weight?
How many rounds is a full load, and how long would it last in combat?
What happens if someone forgets to latch that wing panel?

Thanks for sharing...
 
I am really digging the way this turned out. I don't have time to closely inspect but I think this is my best metal finish yet. I'm going to leave this one factory fresh when I'm done. Hope you like it! And yes, I got in trouble doing this on Mother's Day.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7888.jpeg
    IMG_7888.jpeg
    1.6 MB
  • IMG_7887.jpeg
    IMG_7887.jpeg
    1.5 MB
Clearly the wings were designed to handle the weight of all that ammo
The wings are the strongest major part of any aircraft — their whole reason for being is carrying its entire weight, after all :)

how much did it add to the plane's weight?
How many rounds is a full load
These two need answering together: 425 rounds per gun, making 3400 in all. The weight of .50-calibre ammo varies per type, but apparently, one round with link weighs 5.184 oz, or 147 grammes. That means 3400 weigh 500 kg, making 250 kg per wing.

Incidentally, the roll rate of these aircraft increased as they shot off more of their ammo, because of the decreasing the mass of the ammunition in the outer wings.

and how long would it last in combat?
Rate of fire per gun is 750–850 rounds per minute for an AN/M2 .50-cal. Browning, so each gun has about half a minute's worth of ammo. Since, IIRC, you can only fire all of them or none of them at a time, that means a P-47 has about 30 to 34 seconds' of firing time, depending on the actual rate of fire of the guns.

What happens if someone forgets to latch that wing panel?
I assume it would open once the wind catches it. The pilot had better hope this happens while getting up to speed on the runway, I suppose :)
 
The wings are the strongest major part of any aircraft — their whole reason for being is carrying its entire weight, after all :)


These two need answering together: 425 rounds per gun, making 3400 in all. The weight of .50-calibre ammo varies per type, but apparently, one round with link weighs 5.184 oz, or 147 grammes. That means 3400 weigh 500 kg, making 250 kg per wing.

Incidentally, the roll rate of these aircraft increased as they shot off more of their ammo, because of the decreasing the mass of the ammunition in the outer wings.


Rate of fire per gun is 750–850 rounds per minute for an AN/M2 .50-cal. Browning, so each gun has about half a minute's worth of ammo. Since, IIRC, you can only fire all of them or none of them at a time, that means a P-47 has about 30 to 34 seconds' of firing time, depending on the actual rate of fire of the guns.


I assume it would open once the wind catches it. The pilot had better hope this happens while getting up to speed on the runway, I suppose :)
I've always found it amazing that pilots were in combat with. 30 seconds of ammo. What's really weird is that even the bombers gunners only had about 30 seconds of ammo which is why they were taught to shoot sparingly and only when in absolute danger… until staff sergeant Arooth came into the picture- this is all US info. As a typical American I don't know the practices of the others, well I believe the British had the same philosophy based on what I've read in 303 squadron.
 
Landing gear for this plane is quite complicated but the kit made it fairly simple. Four different parts. Had to do a minor repair on main gear. Initially was going to go with a dull aluminum but ended up with polished. Coming together nicely and I'm very happy with the paint job. No decals as of yet. Getting the small black stripes was more complicated than I would have thought, wrong word- it was difficult judging where to place the tape as I painted the yellow first, taped over same day, applied the black base, taped over, and then applied the aluminum all in same day. So trying to discern where to place the last bit of tape was hard because everything was getting lost in the black paint. Not sure if this makes sense.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7907.jpeg
    IMG_7907.jpeg
    2.1 MB
  • IMG_7908.jpeg
    IMG_7908.jpeg
    1.8 MB
  • IMG_7909.jpeg
    IMG_7909.jpeg
    1.7 MB
  • IMG_7910.jpeg
    IMG_7910.jpeg
    2.9 MB
  • IMG_7911.jpeg
    IMG_7911.jpeg
    2.4 MB
  • IMG_7912.jpeg
    IMG_7912.jpeg
    2.8 MB
But if you think this looks odd, try a P-47
Another thing odd about the P-47...

Those gun "barrels" are not the actual barrel of the M2, they are hollow tubes with the barrels inside. I do not think any other USAAF fighters did that.
 
Another thing odd about the P-47...

Those gun "barrels" are not the actual barrel of the M2, they are hollow tubes with the barrels inside. I do not think any other USAAF fighters did that.
Were they attached as a heat shield?
 
Clearly the wings were designed to handle the weight of all that ammo, but still, how much did it add to the plane's weight?
Fully loaded with 8 @ .50s it was about 325 pounds. The Jug could carry two 1,000 pound bombs though, so MG ammo was barely noticed, except as Jakko mentioned the roll-rate was likely felt.
How many rounds is a full load, and how long would it last in combat?
The term "the whole nine yards" is typically attributed to the belts of MG ammo, 27 feet of it. Many variables involved, but basically 30-seconds was all you got, they trained to fire short bursts, because (if on-target) that was often all it took, and if you missed you conserved.
What happens if someone forgets to latch that wing panel?
It would be part of a pre-flight check, and visible to the pilot since the leading edge would stick up. If missed it would be a major problem.
 
I've always found it amazing that pilots were in combat with. 30 seconds of ammo.
Depending on specific load-out, German pilots might only have 60-something cannon shells loaded. Thinking of the Mk108 (30mm) which had a very low ROF to begin with.
 
I don't know the practices of the others
TBH, there was not all that much to choose, given how limited the space is in an aircraft. The main thing that made the USAAF stand out was keeping machine guns for the whole war (and into Korea) when everybody else — including the US Navy — had long decided that cannon with exploding shells were more effective. (The US Navy then kept the machine guns anyway because of, IIRC, a lack of suitable cannon produced in the USA.)
 
Not much progress but not a lot of time tonight. Added drop tanks and some misc do-hickeys. Was planning on doing decals tomorrow and realized I missed black stripes on upper wings. I still think I can get this done before the weekend.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7914.jpeg
    IMG_7914.jpeg
    2 MB
Here's a teaser. Unfortunately I have had a mishap that I cannot fix without it becoming a major strip down and do over and I'm not going to do it. Hopefully it's not that noticeable. I had to fix the rear wheel assembly, the plastic shaft was so thin it ended up breaking. I used a tiny piece of brass rod for the new shaft. Also, had a slight mishap painting the propeller this morning. I painted them a beautiful polished aluminum, went to paint the tips white and accidentally got some overspray on one of the blades. I thought no big deal I'll hit it with some aluminum after finishing the tips in yellow. There was such a big difference with that particular blade and the others so I stripped it down and started over. I wish I had taken a pic but it was glaringly obvious that the blade had been touched up. I was very surprised. I think it shows how important the base coat is with the metal finish. Anyway I hope you like where it is so far. I'm out of town for the weekend so I'll be back to the bench to wrap this up next week.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.6 MB
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.7 MB
Total OOB. I wanted the polished aluminum look and this is the best I've ever gotten. Used AK black base and tried a bottle of ammo metallic lacquer polished aluminum that i had bought some time ago and never used. Very impressed with this. Combo. I painted all the striping vs using the decals and was happy with the results. No weathering as I wanted a factory fresh look- ok did hit the exhaust itself with some staining but nothing else. Hope you enjoy.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7994.jpeg
    IMG_7994.jpeg
    2.2 MB
  • IMG_7997.jpeg
    IMG_7997.jpeg
    2.9 MB
  • IMG_7998.jpeg
    IMG_7998.jpeg
    2.2 MB
  • IMG_7999.jpeg
    IMG_7999.jpeg
    4.1 MB
  • IMG_7995.jpeg
    IMG_7995.jpeg
    1.5 MB
  • IMG_7996.jpeg
    IMG_7996.jpeg
    1.6 MB
  • IMG_8001.jpeg
    IMG_8001.jpeg
    1.5 MB
  • IMG_8002.jpeg
    IMG_8002.jpeg
    2.3 MB
  • IMG_8003.jpeg
    IMG_8003.jpeg
    2.1 MB
  • IMG_8004.jpeg
    IMG_8004.jpeg
    2.3 MB
Nice! Quite agree about the colour combo. And the polished aluminium is brilliant. :cool:
Could they have made the landing gear any more complicated?! :oops:
They actually did a great job of making a complicated landing gear simple to assemble. I think it was three parts total.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top