Grendels
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
- Messages
- 9,092
Chekov said:Why, Admiral James T. Kirk
Exarkun77 said:Ok, let's clear this.
He got a point on howard the duck, and he was kind enough to avoid trashing the prequels.
And i'm not sure we want to compare anything to anything, because there is cheesy and crappy stuff on both sides. I don't really like the starwars prequels, but i wouldn't say that the 11 star trek movies are genius work, so let's avoid entering into details
Star wars is my stuff, but i like Star trek too.
(Jedi mind trick) So you will go home and stop comparing what can't be compared ^^
Exarkun77 said:And i'm not sure we want to compare anything to anything, because there is cheesy and crappy stuff on both sides. I don't really like the starwars prequels, but i wouldn't say that the 11 star trek movies are genius work, so let's avoid entering into details
Besides, completely crediting the success of anything after 1991 to Gene and failing to recognize Rick Berman is pretty ludicrous. That's like blaming the failed second revival of Twilight Zone with Forest Whitaker on Rod Serling...
Grendels said:Now you are leaving out Babylon 5. Can't have that. ;D
JMac said:At the time I really liked Lea Thompson in Howard the Duck.
JMac said:IMO the Star Trek version of Howard the Duck has got to be Star Trek V.
Quaralane said:Both have good and bad points.
Been a Trekkie since I could pick what I watched on TV.
Loved Star Wars since 1977.
Although I confess I HATE watching the "Who's better?" fights