Ken Abrams said:
The clear stand that comes in the kit? No. That's not a base, it's just a plastic piece of the kit to hold it in the air.
Sorry for nitpicking, but I'm kinda curious just where you draw the line.
Take, for example, this Battlefront ME 262:
Same model, same base. Only difference (apart from the paint-job) is that one of the bases has been flocked. Are they both okay?
I’m asking because I’ve been toying with entering a heavily converted Ork Bomba which includes a base:
Would that “fly“…? Ha… Ha… Okay… Sorry… Bad pun…
Ken Abrams said:
Why does it suck? Because your tank will look better with the figures right? Think about all the dudes who enter without figures, I bet they think it sucks that yours looks better than theirs.
I can only speak for myself, of course...
I, honestly, think it sucks because a base or crew is a very big part of a model as that’s what creates a setting. A “narrative†if you like...
Yes, I could just paint up a tank, put it down on the table, and take a picture. But where’s the fun in that?
Put it on a base with grass and gently sloping ground, add a few tank-riders, and suddenly you have a T-34 charging across the steppes near Kursk.
As I said in the chat thread, I find un-based models to be utterly boring (in most cases, anyway). But that might just be me...?