"Century Series" #3 F-102 in 1/48 (Revell Pro-Modeler c1990)

Edbert

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 16, 2024
Messages
1,101
I intend to have a shelf in my display for the "Century Series" aircraft. When I came up with that idea, I was not well aware at how large those birds were, even compared to modern combat aircraft. So we'll just have to see if they all fit on one shelf.

Anyway, here is #3, the F-102 "Delta Dagger". It was definitely a combat aircraft, but also was a testbed, there were several wing configurations during her service era. The kit comes with the "Case X Wing" configuration. I will be building a specific craft from the 509th FIS stationed in Thailand March 1962.

This kit is well over 30 years old, I paid $15 for it, there have been really good things and equally bad. I did not take a lot of pics in the early phases.

1744934205318.png
1744934221584.png

Here's a pic of it underway, next to another recent arrival in the "Century Series" shelf.

1744933796323.png

Note the ordinance-bay underneath, 30 years before the F-22, the USAF had a fighter with enclosed weapon bays. However in the early '60s those A2A missiles were HUGE, like a later Phoenix (which was much larger than the AMRAAM) but these are a different "AIM" variant. The 4AE and 4C/D represent heat-seeking and radar-guidance versions.

1744934151726.png

Anyway, this week I have primed, painted, and cleared this kit too.

1744934249835.png
1744934262596.png
1744934275425.png

That styrene colored blob in the middle is the weapons bay cover. That is just there as a convenient mask. I decided to try NOT pre-shading this one. Main reason is the entire dang thing is the same color of light gray. So with a black surface of surfacer 1500, I just slowly, VERY SLOWLY, built up the color. Here's a shot before the clearcoat.

1744934436386.png
1744934451341.png

I'm always amazed to see how often my bare feet are in the pictures!
 
Last edited:
Been following your Century Series. I'm tempted to bust out my old Monogram F-105 that I started 20+ years ago.
 
The Thud is one of my favorites! I'd say "do it" but then I saw Monogram.

There will always be a fond/positive space in my heart for that brand, this 102 was cast in 1990, and it shows. I know some builders will sand down the raised panel lines and scribe them, but that is not me. Maybe some day.

I have a "Hobby Boss" 105 nearing completion, I need to update that thread, but I cannot recommend the kit.
1745012473964.png
There were entire sides of the cockpit just not there, it was designed this way. Similarly there's no intakes, yeah the external parts, but nothing internal, just an opening into the inside of the hollow fuselage. The core issue is those old birds are not being made any more, at least not my premier manufacturers, so one must take what is available unless you are into scratch-building.

But these beauties deserve a dedicated shelf in the display cabinet, if they fit. USAF ships, even single-seaters, of that era were HUUUGE, nearly B-25 size.

1745012587950.jpeg
 
This kit is showing its age, but as with most "Pro Modeler" kits from Monogram/Revell the assembly is decent, the instructions are detailed with the wording and inadequate with the illustrations, as if someone drew them with a sharpie. That said, the progress has been mostly trouble free.

1745450492314.png

I'm fighting another 1990s "Pro Modeler" kit right now and the stickers are fooked with it. I was worried starting this one but for the most part the stickers have been fine.

1745450543919.png


1745450565013.png

Any tips (pun intended) for the leading edge of the tanks being red? I tried hand painting them on the F-4B and it looked weak.
 
I've used a drafting circle template before with an airbrush. Fix the tank in an upright position and hold the correct sized template circle over the tip of the tank (after masking off the adjacent circles on the template). Just dont put the paint on too thick and be extra careful pulling the template away from the tank.

Crude mockup, but like this:
thumbnail (20).jpg
 
Last edited:
Paint them red first (which may need several coats to cover well — most red paints are translucent to some degree) and then wrap masking tape around the tanks. It's always easier to mask "down" than "up": if you were to paint the tanks in their overall colour first and then add the red noses, you would have to put on masking tape so that it sits tightly against the thinner end. But if you paint the red first, the masking tape can go tightly against the tank.
 
Okay, calling this one done. The second of my 6 Century Series birds.

I'd say I skimped out a little on the effort here, took the easy route mainly because of the age of the kit as much as my laziness. I mean there's almost no weathering, I did that to the interior and wheel-wells/weapons-bay/dive brakes, but the large size (square-inches of solid-gray surface) combined with raised panel lines just scared me off.

I think I'll blame me only giving 60-75% effort was because of this...
1745707112919.png

Talk about lazy, I didn't even remove the copyright mark! Nah, I was digging that I just opened and built a 35-year old kit. I know some of you addicts will come in to show the 1950s Bearcat kit you built, but lately I've been looking only at new kits, last few years. Anyway, here's some shots....

1745707257778.png

The instructions are even yellowed with age.

1745707307817.png
Windshield is not fogged, that is a reflection of some kind, but I've no idea how pilots could see out front with that peaked dashboard.

1745707388120.png

1745707398529.png
 
I just completed that kit as part of my historical series for the 148th FW, Duluth MN. The fit of some parts was genuinely terrible, but I'm pleased with the end result.
 
I just completed that kit as part of my historical series for the 148th FW, Duluth MN. The fit of some parts was genuinely terrible, but I'm pleased with the end result.
Agreed. Some bits were quite good and some were "genuinely terrible". Choice as slim for the old subject matter items.
 


Write your reply...

Latest posts

Back
Top