Not sure what I said that made you think I was a "loving follower."  I simply offered an alternate opinion of Phil's site and paying for videos and forums.  In fact I did agree that there is plenty of content available that doesn't cost money.  But in the spirit of the discussion, I urged people to make up their own minds about what they find helpful etc.  in my experience, I've found nothing wrong with paying for content.  What is different about buying a magazine vs. watching a YouTube video.  If I want to pay to see how Ken weathered something, what's wrong with that?  Are people not allowed to make a living.  Again, I've found plenty of "pay to play" material useful and I urge everybody to test things out for themselves.